THE ZERO PARADIGM 2: TRANSCENDANCE

Never settle for less.

I'm sure you have heard this little catch all phrase numerous times. How ready to live by it are you?

We are mislead by an early age that we must sacrifice to have what we truly want. Most people are taught how to sacrifice but how many know what they truly want and how to get it?

Psychology is a funny thing and in reality where were at is actually right where we truly think we want to be.

It's all in the equation:

actual goals - inertia = true desire

Our actual goals may be to become rich and famous. The actual work involved in the fantasy stage is irrelavant. At this point we are just concerned with the data. We know exactly who and what we wish we were. So where then, does this "limit" come from?

The law of inertia states that an object at rest will remain at rest. Well, if we desire rest more than achievement then how far do we get?

This brings us then to our true desires. Most people just dont want to work for what they have. This is how we ended up with welfare and everything socialist. This is the key failure of the vision of a utopian society (*like the one in zeitgeist 2 addendum).

On an individual scale this seems innocuous. Who cares if some looser does not succeed in life. Why is that your problem, right?

READ ON.

Most of the sheeple, proles, uselesseaters and the like simply don't have the ability to resist the powers of Inertia and Entropy. They come to a grinding halt after school and wither and die in a factory, cubicle, or section 8 home.

This leaves the "benevolent Illuminatti" holding up the rest. Governments never fail the people. They are outnumbered by them. We must then blame the real culprit. The hungry masses.

Lets look at some of the common social ills and how they are created:

• Raises and set wages are secretly bad but the people don't understand economics. They think that by raising or setting a minimum wage they will get more when in reality after the economic adjustment they will actually get less. The company at the mercy of a minimum wage can't adjust pay rates to hire more workers. There is more unemployment so the government prints more money. Taxes increase to cover them. The pinch hurts the consumer so the company lays off even more. Rather than accepting more work, reducing consumption or offering something of value, some of the poeple ask yet again for more money. The wheel turns on.


• Affirmitave Action and Political Correctness are due to poeple being to lazy to inform themselves past racial, ethnic, gender, and sexual stereotypes. Granted, stereotypes only exist because most poeple fit the mold, but those who fail to see past them create conflicts. The government once again steps in with the F.C.C. and other Civil Rights organizations in toe. We actually lose equality as certian groups are protected and certian words and phrases become forbidden. Yet another example of how freedom is lost when we expect the government to solve a problem.


• Police protection and a military are only needed as long as violence exists. Why does violence exist? There are ways to succeed by force and there are ways to exist by peaceful means but they require more work. It's alot easier to steal than grow or mine. Its alot easier to lie and cheat than to do honest work. Its easier to force someone to do something than to convince them to work against lazy instincts. Violence then becomes the easy choice.


• The environment is trashed because were too lazy. There really is no better, simpler, more elegant explanation. We know what we should and shouldn't do but we choose to instead support cheap products that cause enviornmental devastation on a corporate level. The corporation cuts corners and creates devastation all to save a few dollars at a time. We kill the future to make the present more convienent. On an individual level, responsible trash collection, recycling, compact flourescent bulbs, water conservation and other means put the individual consumers back to sleep. These methods are nothing more than a band-aid when the problem isn't the cut of pollution, it is the infection of laziness.

You may wonder why DJHIVES, Stephan Molyneux,Esther Villar, Dante, DeKn, Lucifer, Komar B., Sphere and many others do what we do. The real benefit to our benevolence is that with the more people we wake up, the better shot we have at raising the number of valuable poeple in our society to stem the tide! You see with a society like ours being interdependent as it is, we realize that money is not the issue.

The real issue plaguing the world today is far more sinister. It is personal value.

The reason why the world "SUCKS" is because the people in it suck! The individual choices of the masses add up to the sum of its direction, therefore we must buck the trend and see through it.

Of course seeing and doing are two different things...

This is why I'm about to get harsh on myself first and others second.

Settling for less is something that I will no longer give myself the luxury of doing. The "hard way" is the only way to succeed. I could get a loan and take credit, but in the end interest fucks me. I could beg for a raise and a wage hike, but who else am I fucking over? Far be it for me to deny that I need to EAT THEM, however dont the sheeple already "eat" each other every day?

We must then evolve a step further still. This is about evolving above and beyond the predator into something I call transcendance.

Pro-Illuminatti or Anti-Illuiminatti simply represent the illusion of control.
I don't buy it anymore. We are capable individuals who can resist this limitation through a consious effort to better ourselves in the leanest and meanest of times. In other words we will refuse to accept that we are at the complete mercy of the state or its sheep. The truth is that the fears and hopes of an entire generation have given power to the conspiracy by fearing or working for those involved. It is time to accept the obsolescence of such ideals and to use the data gained from this dark age to better ourselves technologically and spiritually without the desire for power and controll or religious sentiment.

There is no excuse for the sheeple-victims or those robber-barrons who benefit from their wasteful existence.
I'm not going to stand for it anymore. I'm tired of settling for below standard poeple. It's time to stop coddling the socially retarded and catering to the needs of a useless society for the sake of its stagnant culture and limited energy. The transcendant must forge ahead to construct a reality worth having utilizing their mental resources as a realistic blueprint for the education and development of a sustainable intellectualy driven society based upon mutually beneficial exchange. In other words, not a utopia of the socialist or a capitalist republic, but a society willing to return to the development of an evolving social paradigm above the corporate/political solution itself.

The individual will be cared for but the individual will also be at fault.
I'm no longer going to lump people into group dynamics for the sake of simplistic generalization. There are billions of poeple on this planet who can care for themselves but also each other. It is lazy to believe that a single set of officials and government entities can be responsible for this individual's wellbeing. They are responsible entirely for their reaction to the environment that the masses create. However the masses are individuals responsible for the creation of the society at large. Its too easy to categorize for a group only to watch a few slip through the cracks. Like populations of insects faced with a pesticide these few become immune to the method and rebell until a new method must be used. Consensus therefore is no longer a given solution to problems on a large scale.

In other words state laws will always conflict with the feds. look at California's drug laws or Nevada's prostitution laws. What works for one tribe does not work for all tribes. In an age where much is possible we must not allow the government to pidgenhole the people into such broad and general rulings. Law and order must therefore become subjective to what the local population will and will not tolerate in a given area. The care of the individual will increase as less is spent on local prohibitions and restrictions. When one can simply move to or visit an area that suits them, who cares about the current location? We will evolve from the limitations of place into freedom based upon a common ideal once more.

Technology must become emphasized but not a dependency.
In a society with highly individual and customizable technology to serve us is it any wonder why were in this mess? We are all at the mercy of this change. Many children do not amuse themselves without the help of videogames, mp3s, television, the internet, or cellphones. Many schoolchildren would be lost without google, pocket calculators, clipart libraries or other such tools. We can no longer ignore the potential of technology to become a mental prosthetic. Many are lost without their cellphones, or gps. Few know how the sun and stars could guide them home. To forget the wonders of technology would be a crime but we must recognize when we are using them as a crutch for the sheeple as well. We have the ability to reach the stars, yet we loose the funding and will to do so by enabling the lazy.

Working toward a mechanized workforce requires intelligent supervision.
It is entriely possible and functionally efficient to replace the masses working in menial tasks with a highly eficient robotic workforce. However this requires that the individuals running the machines are specialized in the care and maintenance of such machines. By utilizing a mechanized workforce in industrial production as well as commercial production we are given more freedom to choose professions worthy of intellect. However this also gives us the ability to be lazy as well. The intelligent supervision therefore comes in the form of working with and training the non-mechanical in positions suited for the administrative or creative functions of society. MacDonalds food could just as easily come out of a giant vending machine. A real restaraunt is more than a dispensary. Likewise most support functions and call routing can be done through push button queues, however people will still need to be at the other end of the line in case the individual needs one on one attention. Enntertainment and even themeparks could become a fully virtual experience, yet some will still prefer the ability to ride a real coaster. Nature and the ecosystem will remain as well as we all continue to have a place in this high tech society. We are still animals none the less.

Moving toward a synthetic society will not be an easy task when the ilusions of an individual reality still live in the hearts and minds of men.
To become transcendant means to remove the perception where us and they exist. There is only we as there has been only we forever. Look outside and see the poeple, because we are all there ever was or ever will be. Reality is not simply the place you live, but the place we exist. The individual has a place but it is up to the group wether or not your gifts are valuable. It is not yours to sponge off of nor is it your reality to rule. There is only the we. The more you hurt, you or I (*us), the more we hurt. Hurting me or hurting you hurts us because the collective is all there is. If I am as selfish as to considder suicide or homicide that would mean I am taking over. Suicide in small doses comes from laziness, addiction, low self esteem or worth, in general it is a function of fear. Homicide in small doses comes from greed, being inconsidderate, false senses of superiority or hatred. We must evolve beyond such weakness of the self to see that "WE".

The socially suicidal rob others of their power by requiring others to care for them. Their weak victim mentality only serves to bring others to their aid. Like the beggar or the damsel in distress, by refusing personal responsibility they drain others of their resources and time by requiring that others care for them or come to their aid.

Likewise the outwardly destructive nature of the sociopathic or socially homicidal becomes apparent when the neurosis reaches critical mass. They see this weakness as a function of the society rather than a function of the self and seek to eradicate the society or individuals that garner their blame and anger.

What is the philosophy of the predator or "EAT THEM" if it does not allow one to function? These thinly veiled disguises teach actual social skills! I believe it is high time I let you, the reader in on the inside joke. For those who care so much about the Illuminatti there has been an awful lot of lust for power. Why become concerned with something that one would deem so evil? Secretly you admire it! To sit like some and talk of how law is unfair yet to turn around the next instant to want to rule is irony at its best. Yet at the same time you also must percieve a weakness in the self where there is none!

The self therefore is another fabrication to keep you in check! By choosing to allow you to focus solely on your desires it has been the oldest trick in the book. The old myth about one man standing up against all is really an allegory of the fantasy and myth that the self exists! It is divide and conquer. By allowing the self to persist apart from the "WE", the sheeple are seperated from the very herd they claim to love. This is why they eat each other. This is why Hives bitches. The greed of the individual is their destruction. To truly transcend our weakness it is therefore a requirement that we all see the truth. The individual exists only in the mind itself, for in reality we observe so many others like ourselves that it is foolish to deny our collective and social nature on this planet.

Special thanks to my readers and those who inspired me towards this realization.

Zero_Messiah
SAVE YOURSELF IS OBSOLETE
DO NOT SIMPLY SURVIVE

TRANSCEND

You have to be asleep...

You have to be asleep to believe the american dream.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Colossus

You need to pick out the words to really see the metaphor.

Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,

With conquering limbs astride from land to land;

Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand

The collossus at rhodes was a monument constructed to ward of invaders and barbarians, but think about that for a moment. Isnt a monument like that actually going to serve as a landmark for potential invaders? Invaders or terrorists?

A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame

Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name

Mother of Exiles.

"Mother of Exiles." The american people were slaves and pilgrim tax cheat fugitives. The other immigrants sought out asylum for many reasons but the meaning is clear. America is a land of outcast people that the other nations wanted to either kill or get rid of. Thjis is further evidenced in the last few lines...

From her beacon-hand

Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command

The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.

"World-wide welcome" Again this further evidences the true nature of our new collossus. The torch of illumination and the symbolism of columba remains prevalent. Of course the neo-pagan symbolism is obvious but how many know about its link to another statue?

The Statue of Liberty was a gift from France, Built on Liberty Island in New York Harbor. The statue was officially dedicated in 1886 and made a national monument in 1924.

Three years later in 1889, the United States presented France with a replica of the statue, one quarter of the American statue's size, which now stands on an island in the Seine River in Paris.

"The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame." The route between France and the Americas was a famous trade route. The mother of exiles is little more than a gate keeper of that golden gate, which incidentally was built. The golden gate bridge. Why is it that we find more symbollism when the other coast is reached? Its simple geography when you realize the proximity to Mexico. Especially since it was built in San Fransisco, saint of the Fransiscan monks.

The bridge is not symbollic of the beauty of our nation, it is simply a symbol for the other end being closed after the great work of 1776 was completed. The real "Golden Gate" is the strait that the bridge spans. It was first named "Chrysopylae," meaning "golden gate," by Captain John C. Fremont in 1846. 70 years later.

"Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she

With silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor,

Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,

The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.

Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,

I lift my lamp beside the golden door!

Again, the "wretched refuse of your teeming shore" alludes to the obvious. They are herded to the golden door. This is classical conditioning and bait and switch tactics. The american colonists were not free, they were exiled. It was arranged to conquer the Americas and it worked. The american people were allways pawns in a hidden military campaign to create an off shore base for the queen mum that operated outside of her laws. Why do you think Clinton and Blair were so buddy buddy. Why do you think we allied with them in the world war? Why do you think we powered the industrial age? Slaves do the work, peasants do the work, America was the origional sweat shop.

We are made to think of the american dream as freedom granted by the constitution. We are always free people, this is our inalienable right that we give through induction.

Another example if I may:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pledge_of_Allegiance

The current version of the Pledge of Allegiance reads:

"I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

According to the United States Flag Code, the Pledge "should be rendered by standing at attention facing the flag with the right hand over the heart. When not in uniform men should remove any non-religious headdress with their right hand and hold it at the left shoulder, the hand being over the heart. Persons in uniform should remain silent, face the flag, and render the military salute."

YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO PAY TAXES SLAVE!!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegiance

Origin of the word

Mid. English ligeaunce; med. Latin ligeantia("a liegance"); the al- was probably added through confusion with another legal term, allegeance, an allegation; the French allegeance comes from the English; the word is formed from "liege," of which the derivation is given under that heading; the connection with Latin ligare, to bind, is erroneous.

Usage

The term allegiance is often used by English legal commentators in a larger sense, divided by them into natural and local, the latter applying to the deference which even a foreigner must pay to the institutions of the country in which he happens to live; but it is in its proper sense. In which it indicates national character and the subjection due to that character, that the word is important.

In that sense it represents the feudal liege homage, which could be due only to one lord, while simple homage might be due to every lord under, whom the person in question held land.

United Kingdom

The English doctrine, which was at one time adopted in the United States, asserted that allegiance was indelible: "Nemo potest exuere patriam". Accordingly, as the law stood before 1870, every person who by birth or naturalization satisfied the conditions set forth, though he should be removed in infancy to another country where his family resided, owed an allegiance to the British crown which he could never resign or lose, except by act of parliament or by the recognition of the independence or the cession of the portion of British territory in which he resided.

Allegiance is the tie which binds the subject to the Sovereign in return for that protection which the Sovereign affords the subject. It was the mutual bond and obligation between monarch and subjects, whereby subjects are called his liege subjects, because they are bound to obey and serve him; and he is called their liege lord, because he should maintain and defend them (Ex parte Anderson (1861) 3 El & El 487; 121 ER 525; China Navigation Co v Attorney-General (1932) 48 TLR 375; Attorney-General v Nissan [1969] 1 All ER 629; Oppenheimer v Cattermole [1972] 3 All ER 1106). The duty of the Crown towards its subjects is to govern and protect. The reciprocal duty of the subject towards the Crown is that of allegiance.

At common law allegiance is a true and faithful obedience of the subject due to his Sovereign. As the subject owes to his king his true and faithful allegiance and obedience, so the Sovereign is to govern and protect his subjects, regere et protegere subdititos suos, so as between the Sovereign and subject there is:

duplex et reciprocum ligamen; quia sicut subditus regi tenetur ad obedientiam, ita rex subdito tenetur ad protectionem; merito igitur ligeantia dicitur a ligando, quia continet in se duplex ligamen (Calvin's Case (1608) 7 Co Rep 1a; Jenk 306; 2 State Tr 559; 77 ER 377).

If the constitution (supposedly) protects soveriegnty the pledge to the flag erodes it. They just keep waving it in our faces.

Again, more history:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic

Republic

A republic is a form of government in which the head of state is not a monarch [1] and the people (or at least a part of its people)[2] have an impact on its government.[3][4] The word 'republic' is derived from the Latin phrase res publica which can be translated as "public affairs".

Both modern and ancient republics vary widely in their ideology and composition. The most common definition of a republic is a state without a monarch.[5] In republics such as the US and France the executive is legitimated both by a constitution and by popular suffrage. In the United States Founding Fathers like James Madison defined republic in terms of representative democracy as opposed to only having direct democracy[6], and this usage is still employed by many viewing themselves as "republicans".[7] In modern political science, republicanism refers to a specific ideology that is based on civic virtue and is considered distinct from ideologies such as liberalism.[8]

Most often a republic is a sovereign country, but there are also subnational entities that are referred to as republics. For instance, Article IV of the Constitution of the United States "guarantee[s] to every State in this Union a Republican form of Government."[9] The Soviet Union was a single nation composed of distinct and legally sovereign Soviet Socialist Republics.

Niccolò Machiavelli described the governance and foundation of the ideal republic in his work Discourses on Livy. These writings, as well as those of his contemporaries such as Leonardo Bruni, are the foundation of the ideology political scientists call republicanism.[10][11]

The idea of a republic first appeared in the writings of Italian scholars of the Renaissance, most importantly Niccolo Machiavelli.[10][12] Machiavelli divided governments into two types, principalities ruled by a monarch and republics ruled by the people.[13][14]

Quotes from Niccolo Machiavelli:

"He who has the gold makes the rules."

"All cities that ever, at any time, have been ruled by an absolute prince, by aristocrats, or by the people, have had for their protection force combined with prudence, because the latter is not enough alone, and the first either does not produce things, or when they are produced, does not maintain them. Force and prudence, then, are the might of all the governments that ever have been or will be in the world."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niccolo_Machiavelli

The reliance on the protection of the state is evidenced in the words of the true forefathers of this country. Rome. We are all a party to their ideals and their history. Government is still rule. You cannot have freedom with limitation. We depend on their protection perpetuating their lies at the tablecloth. America is not paved with gold, rather a trail of blood sweat and tears. We refused to remain self reliant as individual states and failed in our only attempt at a revolution during the civil war. We have been willingly duped into a lie since our education by our lack of legal and historical understanding. The language is straightforward and the truth is hidden in plain sight for anyone smart enough to look for it.

-Dedicated to George Carlin