Spiritual wisdom tempered by scientific knowledge will become the salvation of the intellect. If we can just approach a mutual understanding of these higher concepts through critical thinking, and break through the conditioning and abuse of our psyche, the revolution will be won within us all. We will have truly saved ourselves.
Am I Paranoid from Adam Stalker on Vimeo.
SPHERE VS SOLID SNAKE
Sphere said...
For the poor kid to become a millionaire he would have to become a predator/proton/gangsta, whatever you wanna call it. Isn't this the same method as applied in nature? Eat or be eaten? Is this not animal-like behaviour?
And statistically speaking, that poor kid would have a lot of variables working against him. It is possible but he/she will have a harder time then a rich kid if you ask me! But then again, who am I...
A poor kid :)
October 12, 2009 4:05 AM
Solid Snake said...
I can't argue with you.Many of you have absorbed the sick fucks' mentality which is constructed of yelling on internet, negativity, anti-social behavior and paranoid schizophrenia.
I suggest you to read The power of now and to meditate a little.
And Sphere, I finished medicine secondary school so I read about natures laws.
You say that the poor kid has disadvantages, but what if it is highly intelligent?
Is that going to even the odds?
October 12, 2009 10:14 AM
Contest:
Sphere will attempt to argue the case for the social predator as a way of life, Solid Snake will demonstrate a case against it.
IT HAS BEGUN!!!
I'm taking more risks with my writing. Let me know what you think.
***
I was at the club when I met my mentor. He was sitting there nursing a beer watching one of the dancers. He was plainly dressed in a button down shirt and slacks that looked as if they came from walmart. His hair had a common cut but he was relatively well kept.
I brushed past him at first to get a drink for a girl across the bar. She was in fishnets and thigh high boots in a leather mini dress. It was a bondage club so this was attractive but not out of place. I wanted to get to know her but back then I was shy. I couldn't talk to girls much less look them in the eye.
I was your typical 22 year old college shit. I dressed in a leather jacket and ripped jeans with no shirt and a spiked collar. I looked like I was in a band with my blue hair and eye liner. I thought I had things figured out.
As I asked the bartender what drinks were popular the man in the buttoned down shirt stopped me with a question. "So, what is she going to do for you?"
I stopped in my tracks and said the honest answer, "I don't know."
"If someone bought me a drink, I'd drink it. Thats what drinks are for. What do you really want?"
"I want to talk to her."
The man lit a cigarette and smiled as he watched the dancer.
"Is that all?"
The dancer leaned into him teasing him as he spoke to me. His face remained amused yet almost blank.
"Well I'm looking to get laid, c'mon what else man?"
"Have you ever seen the matrix series?"
I paused.
"The last one just came out. I loved those movies, it made me wake up."
He chuckled and sighed, he put out the butt and said.
"You don't understand it do you?"
I was confused, and he spoke again.
"The whole time his only weakness was Trinity. He was standing at the door to enlightenment and gave it all up for the pussy."
I ordered a shot of Jagermeister and sat by the man. He remained staring at the dancer. She kept trying to get his attention, it was weird. Here he was apparently doing nothing but she was completely consumed with getting his attention.
I downed the shot and chased it with a coke. The dancers were changing out and the dancer walked up to him. She whispered in his ear and he left the bar with her.
"Good luck."
I continued to sit at the bar watching the next dancer. She was gorgeous but I was a little wary of the dancers. I started gazing at another girl across the way. She was a cute little thing drinking nearby. She drank beer instead of cocktails. She was alone and looked bored.
Maybe it was the dude with the dancer, or maybe it was the third shot but I had the courage back that I needed.
"You look bored!"
"Excuse me?" She leaned forward and I noticed her chest. She caught me but she waited for me to speak again.
"I said you look bored."
"Yeah, the songs are starting to repeat around here like radio."
I paused, the question seemed dumb because this was a fetish club, the people all listened to the same stuff here, but I asked anyways.
"So, what music are you into?"
She grabbed her purse and grabbed a clove cigarette from her case.
"I'm going out to smoke, do you want one?"
I grabbed it and lit it up. We walked down the stairs and left the club. We watched the cars passing by on palm avenue. The moon was full and there was a soft breeze rolling by.
"So what were you wanting to ask me?"
"What music are you into?"
She paused and I thought I was a fool until she spoke.
"Depeche Mode, Souxie and The Cramps, I like alot of shit."
"Me too, I listen to some of the goth shit like Sisters of Mercy but I like alot of metal too."
We kept talking for what seemed like hours. I liked watching her mouth move as the black lipstick smudged off leaving black marks on the butt of her cigarette. She was a nine out of ten inside, but the streetlights let me know she was a solid seven. I even noticed the baby fat peeking around the top of her corset when her arms moved. She was still cute but I'd realized how short she'd be without the boots on. My shoulders eased up, and she put her legs on my lap. Her Leather boots and fishnets hid what denim couldn't. I simply ignored it and let my thoughts flow like water. We connected.
"So do you like to be dominated?"
"What?" I almost choked on the smoke that exited my lips.
She scratched her nails across my chest. Light welts and spots of blood formed across my breastbone.
"Yeah, I like things rough if thats what you mean."
She kissed me and bit into my lip. She was on me like a bad habit. I noticed things, subtle imperfections, the way she tastes, her heavy breath, the cheap foundation caked over hidden zits, the botched tattoo on her thigh, the way her hair started to frizz in the moist Florida air. The more I resisted the more I was in control. She was dominated by her emotions.
I was trying to resist her and it worked. I acted aloof and she wanted it more. I quickly realized that I was getting something for nothing, or almost nothing.
What did I do tonight that was so different from so many nights before?
***
Women say they want a nice guy but those are the norm, not the rarity. Think about all of the beta males serving as life support for these useless eaters. Remember back when Lady Anon used to come here talking her shit about men. She was obsessed with talking about the asshole men. Notice how she never really talked about the betas, even though she claimed to want a nice guy.
Pook's Mill had several posts about this subject in great detail. Esther Villar was the foundation of much of the knowledge gained. DJ knew this dynamic and even experimented with their life support in his blog. I actually want to go further than this.
Women either like you or they don't. Period. No amount of chivalry, gifting or chivalrous metro-sexual beehiveior will save you from rejection. They will use you because if they do not like you from the moment they meet you, you will be their bitch.
"Do you know that look that your wife gives you sometimes? That look like they are mad at ya that you can't explain, and they don't? It's because your not their first choice!" -Chris Rock
Beta males are the nice guys. The players all lavish gifts on their hos but really who is getting played here? All the chick has to do is to put on a skimpy outfit and fuck them. In essence what we have here is just that, Getting (P)laid.
Once the divorce is over and the alimony has been paid, the men of the world really are slaves. They pay taxes to the IRS, and money to the MRS. Freedom therefore is just that. A bachelor working under the table is the most dangerous thing the government has ever known.
They pay no taxes that they can claim, they have no family to exploit, they are not tied to any location. They do not have to pay lip service to any religion, they do not have to work any harder than to sustain themselves, they have the free time to create and educate themselves. This is how the battery removes the terminal cables from themselves. The bachelor literally is what society fears most. Seize the day, freedom is here.
Carpe Cainem, Seize the Bitch!
Instant feedback:
DebtInterest said...
Another important article!
I totally agree with you.
I see my dad, I hate him and despise him but at the same time, feel bad for him. He works works works and works but all he get from his wife is bitching... He is so fucking greedy or pressured to provide that he took on big loan to speculate real estate market and he doesn't know soon he will be fucked... Of course what he get from his wife is more bitching...
He probably married because of his mom... his mom probably said "get married and then I will call you a good boy~"
I understand that marriage for men is slavery, especially in this day and age. However, is it possible for men to control women and be free? Or, is it an oxymoron; marriage and freedom?
Isn't either marriage or freedom more like the reality for men?
I feel so bad for him...
Is control freedom? There is the rub. Freedom is the ability to do what ever you want without the need for anything else but your own abilities to sustain you.
If I were to take a girl as a pet much the same as they do with men, what I would have is a liability due to her inability to provide for herself.
Therefore I simply bring her home, fuck her and let her go.
Catch and release keeps a sport from being a job.
Think of all the work the elite do just to raise the human farm...
Nature would disagree as all of the laws of nature that apply to animals apply to us. We evolved from animals, why deny our carnal nature in favor of this myth?
"Society is created to give equal chance to anyone but it often fails."
Wrong, society is created as a control mechanism for our carnal nature and our inhumanity. Concensus is required to keep the human farm going. I could go on to evidence this point but even the sheeple on youtube will tell you this. What I offer you is a chance to rise above equality to attempt to become elite. Its another honest truth but your goal in life should be to rise above others around you. In other words you want to be an elitest because it ensures your survival. Predators are always higher on the food chain than their prey. The laws of nature always apply, even to hippy philosophers and capitalist pigs.
"There is much wisdom to this blogs, but they are constantly trying one thing:to find a formula and put the life, something that cannot be measured and grasped, into a mathematical equation."
Philosophy = Sentience. The very thing that separates you from the other animals is the very thing you are avoiding here. Philosophy and science are the ways we try to find answers to the questions we have about the nature of things. I'm not here to say that animals of higher intelligence cannot do this, however what I will claim is that this is why most scholarly humans feel superior to the other animals.
"As for the Dj, I honestly believe that he is a sick fuck. He says to generalize and there is nothing further from the truth. Do as I did, stop follow him."A sick fuck would not spend so much effort helping others. The sheeple are the sick fucks. They consume mass quantaties of resources in the effort to create concensus. They entertaint themselves with the two-minutes-hate and the psychodrama. They set some bars too low like education while setting other bars too high like fashion. There are two pills here and I sense a blue pill in there... WAKE UP!
You may struggle with the truth but why do you think we are told to protect ourselves from the sheeple first? They are the brainwashed first line of defense for the status quo.
You forgot to take your rations...
These lyrics are proof that sometimes you have to read between the lines to get the message.
Getting your message across is all in how you package yourself. Don't believe me? Type in the link at the bottom.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwTZ2xpQwpA
"I heard about the survival of the moderate. the scientist actually discovered that one who survives is not the fittest but the moderate. Could it be possible that the moderate is one who understand the Law of Nature? that there is a certain rule or law that govern us no matter what matrix we are in? if you have a time, maybe you could show me some light on this." - DebtInterest
This could not be further from the truth as government and society in general is a consensus lead by a governing body.
Think about the foundations of government.
Elections are based on popularity, not only popular candidates but popular opinions. Even if the elections are rigged the information still remains a factor in politics. Look into any ruling system and the people have to agree by a wide enough margin to overcome the militant force.
But, what is moderation? Popular opinion will create the environment in which the individual lives so any deviation will not be tolerated. Just like the microcosm of high school the macrocosm of the "real world" pushes out cultural deviants through social or physical punishment. In a democracy this works through mob rule but through a monarchy it simply works as those who consent and those who do not.
Throw away this whole oneness with the universe crap, it is really just a morality play for your conformity. Think about it. The key to life is outward conformity with inner deviance. Any time you let your inner freak show, you are fingered by the elite as a mark. You are then distracted by music trends, political movements, and other forms of diversion. You will not be the chosen one of the elite because you favor your own ideals. You are not yet ready for the new world order as a way of life.
Why else would the elite be all about groups? Groups are the key to achieving their goals. You need massive consensus to achieve the kinds of change that they are after. Corporations, groups like Bilderberg, the Illuminati, and others are all groups. There is no such thing as a conspiracy of one.
Get this into your heads:
One man will never change the world.
It was hard for me to face it but that whole superhero shit about one guy overcoming adversity is a crock of shit. Unless a hero inspires the people they have no power. Power comes through mobs. Mobs built all the monuments based on one mans design. Mobs won all of the wars based on one mans plans for conquest. It always has been and always will be the masses that change the world, but it is the controller of the masses that will make the change.
This is all that induction can do. Induction and Consensus facilitate Change.
If one man were to rally the people today they would be competing against the many who already have the consensus in place. The change will not come unless over 66% of the world both realize and agree with the new idea of this man. It also depends on the relative wealth and resources of this group. An overthrow of the world government would only occur if the wealthy also had power against it.
There will be no change unless this happens but because of the consent of the public the current laws and government exist. The sheeple will never rebel and the survival of the individual depends on the principal of moderate deviation. Living in the gray areas of a black and white world bears the most fruitful outcome. You have to blend in like so much of the camouflage of animals. It has a purpose, and if your past is an indicator you will be fingered much to early to fix it in the future.
The school systems of all countries public and private account for consensus through grading you mentally and psychologically. Fail at school and you will most likely fail at life, but not for the reasons advertised. In coming to know the struggle for popularity you know that it is the main factor in your grading. The teachers pet learned to conform early, this is why they were likely to be the most successful. The class clown learned to entertain, this is why they can still charm their way out of things. The book smart nerd learned to shut up and produce, and this is why they will always remain a grind. If you look back to the behaviors learned in school and then look at where they are today the only thing that determined the future of the individual is the environment that they ended up in. If a clown fit the consensus then they are probably a success, and there are even conditions where even the teachers pet will fail but this is simply a product of environmental consensus.
Adaptation to the environment is simply consensus.
We can either adapt, flee, or die. When we flee we attempt to change the environment to suit ourselves. When we adapt we change ourselves to suit our environment, thus the moderate will always succeed because they are the most adaptable. The adaptors are predators, those who flee are simply prey. Now you know the difference.
Just remember, that being a moderate does not mean denying your urges. Moderation simply means keeping those urges private.
Instant feedback:
Sphere said...
Sooo basically you're saying to simply be and go with the flow (as in adapt)?
Zero Said:
No sphere, I am telling you to outright lie to the sheeple mobs.
Like the swine flu vaccine:
Sheeple: "Did you get the vaccine?"
You:"Yes."
Like drug use:
Sheeple:"Have you ever tried pot."
You:"Never."
Like religion:
Sheeple:"Do you accept Jesus as your lord and savior?"
You:"Yes."
Lies = Camouflage.
Easy, no?
I'm taking a risk and waxing philosophical.
It's my blog, I'm allowed...
Hypertext links are pending...
I looked at the cyberpunk books and movies of the 80s and early 90s and realized that everything in those books is not only possible now but exists in the form of realized technologies and jaded ideologies. We exist in a time where corporations (*namely corporate lobbyists) really do hold political power over governments. Large multinational corporations have more of the governments money in their control (*including the Federal Reserve). We all exist in a time where robotics have the power to enhance the human body (*hal-5 exoskeleton). We can even replace human actors and even singers (*Hatsune Miku) in the media we create.
What is the point of being human? Is humanity really a goal or a starting point? What are we really afraid of? If we are afraid of being mind hacked, we must simply remember the mind control of Mk-Ultra. If we are afraid of losing sensations such as touch or sight we must remember that if everything is an electrical signal to the brain then even this moment could be simply a simulated experience.
Why bemoan the virtual when we play games with reality everyday such as using a credit system of virtual cash or substituting real men with *metrosexualism? We have always been fabricators as well as builders. Every monument has its facade. We are in essence only an extension of the masks we've worn because many of us really have little to do with our innerself as much as discovering our abilities to please and interact with others. The social experience is a chain of events of displays of emotion and effort but we are no closer to others than we are to ourselves.
Maybe I'm getting off topic here, but this virtual reality is neither real nor virtual. We are descendants of a diluted culture. We do not have our bearings as a whole but yet we do not grasp what identity is to the individual. If you are between the ages of 18-30 you probably understand the feeling that there is nothing left to be into. The newness fades quickly and the attention span of most cultures or even subcultures degenerates by the decade. The faces we wear in the name of fashion or cultural conventions leap wildly between the extremes of liberalism and conservatism yet in nature there is only a balance dictated by what works.
The tribal ethic of the past was a tribal identity. This has been replaced by sports, military, career, or interest based groups. We can literally join and drop tribes ad hock for what suits us in the moment, even though psychologically we develop based on habitual patterns. This means that as we add and drop we are shaping ourselves based on momentary values. Unless habitually similar patterns have been chosen then we will develop as walking blanks. These walking blanks will have no association to anyone or anything other than gratification. For the sake of reference they are more like the Proles (*from 1984)
I can understand the argument of the conservatives for the sake of religion. Humanity needs a grounding ethical foundation. However what I disagree with is the illogical lies that are required to believe in dietys and metaphysical manifestations from ancient legends. I also disagree with the rampant bias against other cultures that creates more wars.
So what happens to the Youtube/On-demand generation that can upload entertainment at will from their phones since birth? They fulfill all of the cyberpunk requirements, Always connected and plugged into a never ending commercialized playground catering to split second gratification.
If the movies and books of yesterday tend to be a plan for the future of today then welcome to cyberpunk. We don't need to wear our computers because our brains act as the ram. We don't need virtual reality (*especially with X-box live). We are all looking at the matrix right now because we are all connected online, a concept which was in the 80s mainstream unheard of.
In essence we are living in that same cyberpunk vision. The U.S. government is no longer a world superpower. There are large wars funded by multinational corporations in control of the government. Information for private corporations really is handled by information couriers in the I.T. field.
However, unlike the movies none of this is handled as glamorously or as symbolically. We are victims of our own limited view. Many do not see the world before them in this light. Hackers do exist, but they are more likely getting free cable or fixing up junk computers than running missions for hire. The cultural ethics of cyberpunk went out the window with the computer friendly 90s. The jet black screen filled with green letters became that world of color that the writers envisioned. The holograms became 3d graphics instead of using bulky headsets we just made the screen a bigger sharper image with HD.
The government and the Illuminati are riding in the backseat when it is the technology that we use that truly shapes us. Our tools are an extension of ourselves and our truest expression of that inner self is only evidenced in the world we create. In a world without fear the possibility of everything becomes one step closer to reality.
You need to pick out the words to really see the metaphor.
Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
The collossus at rhodes was a monument constructed to ward of invaders and barbarians, but think about that for a moment. Isnt a monument like that actually going to serve as a landmark for potential invaders? Invaders or terrorists?
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles.
"Mother of Exiles." The american people were slaves and pilgrim tax cheat fugitives. The other immigrants sought out asylum for many reasons but the meaning is clear. America is a land of outcast people that the other nations wanted to either kill or get rid of. Thjis is further evidenced in the last few lines...
From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
"World-wide welcome" Again this further evidences the true nature of our new collossus. The torch of illumination and the symbolism of columba remains prevalent. Of course the neo-pagan symbolism is obvious but how many know about its link to another statue?
The Statue of Liberty was a gift from France, Built on Liberty Island in New York Harbor. The statue was officially dedicated in 1886 and made a national monument in 1924.
Three years later in 1889, the United States presented France with a replica of the statue, one quarter of the American statue's size, which now stands on an island in the Seine River in Paris.
"The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame." The route between France and the Americas was a famous trade route. The mother of exiles is little more than a gate keeper of that golden gate, which incidentally was built. The golden gate bridge. Why is it that we find more symbollism when the other coast is reached? Its simple geography when you realize the proximity to Mexico. Especially since it was built in San Fransisco, saint of the Fransiscan monks.
The bridge is not symbollic of the beauty of our nation, it is simply a symbol for the other end being closed after the great work of 1776 was completed. The real "Golden Gate" is the strait that the bridge spans. It was first named "Chrysopylae," meaning "golden gate," by Captain John C. Fremont in 1846. 70 years later.
"Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she
With silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!
Again, the "wretched refuse of your teeming shore" alludes to the obvious. They are herded to the golden door. This is classical conditioning and bait and switch tactics. The american colonists were not free, they were exiled. It was arranged to conquer the Americas and it worked. The american people were allways pawns in a hidden military campaign to create an off shore base for the queen mum that operated outside of her laws. Why do you think Clinton and Blair were so buddy buddy. Why do you think we allied with them in the world war? Why do you think we powered the industrial age? Slaves do the work, peasants do the work, America was the origional sweat shop.
We are made to think of the american dream as freedom granted by the constitution. We are always free people, this is our inalienable right that we give through induction.
Another example if I may:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pledge_of_Allegiance
The current version of the Pledge of Allegiance reads:
"I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
According to the United States Flag Code, the Pledge "should be rendered by standing at attention facing the flag with the right hand over the heart. When not in uniform men should remove any non-religious headdress with their right hand and hold it at the left shoulder, the hand being over the heart. Persons in uniform should remain silent, face the flag, and render the military salute."
YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO PAY TAXES SLAVE!!!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegiance
Origin of the word
Mid. English ligeaunce; med. Latin ligeantia("a liegance"); the al- was probably added through confusion with another legal term, allegeance, an allegation; the French allegeance comes from the English; the word is formed from "liege," of which the derivation is given under that heading; the connection with Latin ligare, to bind, is erroneous.
Usage
The term allegiance is often used by English legal commentators in a larger sense, divided by them into natural and local, the latter applying to the deference which even a foreigner must pay to the institutions of the country in which he happens to live; but it is in its proper sense. In which it indicates national character and the subjection due to that character, that the word is important.
In that sense it represents the feudal liege homage, which could be due only to one lord, while simple homage might be due to every lord under, whom the person in question held land.
United Kingdom
The English doctrine, which was at one time adopted in the United States, asserted that allegiance was indelible: "Nemo potest exuere patriam". Accordingly, as the law stood before 1870, every person who by birth or naturalization satisfied the conditions set forth, though he should be removed in infancy to another country where his family resided, owed an allegiance to the British crown which he could never resign or lose, except by act of parliament or by the recognition of the independence or the cession of the portion of British territory in which he resided.
Allegiance is the tie which binds the subject to the Sovereign in return for that protection which the Sovereign affords the subject. It was the mutual bond and obligation between monarch and subjects, whereby subjects are called his liege subjects, because they are bound to obey and serve him; and he is called their liege lord, because he should maintain and defend them (Ex parte Anderson (1861) 3 El & El 487; 121 ER 525; China Navigation Co v Attorney-General (1932) 48 TLR 375; Attorney-General v Nissan [1969] 1 All ER 629; Oppenheimer v Cattermole [1972] 3 All ER 1106). The duty of the Crown towards its subjects is to govern and protect. The reciprocal duty of the subject towards the Crown is that of allegiance.
At common law allegiance is a true and faithful obedience of the subject due to his Sovereign. As the subject owes to his king his true and faithful allegiance and obedience, so the Sovereign is to govern and protect his subjects, regere et protegere subdititos suos, so as between the Sovereign and subject there is:
duplex et reciprocum ligamen; quia sicut subditus regi tenetur ad obedientiam, ita rex subdito tenetur ad protectionem; merito igitur ligeantia dicitur a ligando, quia continet in se duplex ligamen (Calvin's Case (1608) 7 Co Rep 1a; Jenk 306; 2 State Tr 559; 77 ER 377).
If the constitution (supposedly) protects soveriegnty the pledge to the flag erodes it. They just keep waving it in our faces.
Again, more history:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic
Republic
A republic is a form of government in which the head of state is not a monarch [1] and the people (or at least a part of its people)[2] have an impact on its government.[3][4] The word 'republic' is derived from the Latin phrase res publica which can be translated as "public affairs".
Both modern and ancient republics vary widely in their ideology and composition. The most common definition of a republic is a state without a monarch.[5] In republics such as the US and France the executive is legitimated both by a constitution and by popular suffrage. In the United States Founding Fathers like James Madison defined republic in terms of representative democracy as opposed to only having direct democracy[6], and this usage is still employed by many viewing themselves as "republicans".[7] In modern political science, republicanism refers to a specific ideology that is based on civic virtue and is considered distinct from ideologies such as liberalism.[8]
Most often a republic is a sovereign country, but there are also subnational entities that are referred to as republics. For instance, Article IV of the Constitution of the United States "guarantee[s] to every State in this Union a Republican form of Government."[9] The Soviet Union was a single nation composed of distinct and legally sovereign Soviet Socialist Republics.
Niccolò Machiavelli described the governance and foundation of the ideal republic in his work Discourses on Livy. These writings, as well as those of his contemporaries such as Leonardo Bruni, are the foundation of the ideology political scientists call republicanism.[10][11]
The idea of a republic first appeared in the writings of Italian scholars of the Renaissance, most importantly Niccolo Machiavelli.[10][12] Machiavelli divided governments into two types, principalities ruled by a monarch and republics ruled by the people.[13][14]
Quotes from Niccolo Machiavelli:
"He who has the gold makes the rules."
"All cities that ever, at any time, have been ruled by an absolute prince, by aristocrats, or by the people, have had for their protection force combined with prudence, because the latter is not enough alone, and the first either does not produce things, or when they are produced, does not maintain them. Force and prudence, then, are the might of all the governments that ever have been or will be in the world."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niccolo_Machiavelli
The reliance on the protection of the state is evidenced in the words of the true forefathers of this country. Rome. We are all a party to their ideals and their history. Government is still rule. You cannot have freedom with limitation. We depend on their protection perpetuating their lies at the tablecloth. America is not paved with gold, rather a trail of blood sweat and tears. We refused to remain self reliant as individual states and failed in our only attempt at a revolution during the civil war. We have been willingly duped into a lie since our education by our lack of legal and historical understanding. The language is straightforward and the truth is hidden in plain sight for anyone smart enough to look for it.
-Dedicated to George Carlin