Channel 2

Quarks have 6 elemental components to measure ranging from positive to negative.

Atoms have Protons, Neutrons and Electrons. Each having a positive and negative charge.

These atoms form compounds and formulas that are either basic alkaline structures or acidic which when paired correctly combine to form powerful energetic reactions.

A computer has ones and zeroes, and a quantum computer has fuzzy logic centered around ones and zeroes.

We live in between channels of light and darkness, heat and cold, pressure and vacuum, mass and the void.

Scientists always try to divide down to the simplest of elemental components when in truth we only have polarity.

Energy is only generated when the two halves react. Without opposing force there is only inertia.

Any reaction is only the sum of the two charges of any polarity.

All positive forces usually have a stablility about them like the stone in a river. All negative forces seem to carry an entropic principal which etches and erodes over time.

Erosion is gradual but entropy is thermodynamically unavoidable. We will dissolve into a cold, dark vacuum in the end.

We are told to favor the light, but light only accelerates the change. Light and heat after all are the byproducts of an energetic reaction. Light is the result of a charge which eventually drains and corrodes the fuel source. In other words, it is the light that burns and not the darkness.

When polarity occurs opposition reigns and in something new much will be destroyed. Change kills much more than it produces.

In an ever accelerating world of technological brilliance we burn up the planet in the process. We struggle to find sustainable technologies but in the end result anything that uses energy to produce work mechanically will eat resources. Even solar or wind powered technologies must be made from resources in the first place.

How can we reach the distant stars when the trip would eat entire planets? Solar panels only collect the free energy. Tank based systems can only propel you as far as the capacity and the reaction. Even sailing the currents of the solar system through a calculated course of moon-shoting the planets is spotty at best.

The only solution to interstellar travel as I could best guess would be to take advantage of polarity at the smallest point to form the greatest reaction to produce thrust. So far nuclear fusion reactions seem to be one of the strongest we have to create any force. They also consume more energy than they produce at the present time. I think truthfully this is due to the composition of earth as opposed to the composition of the sun. We just don't have the density needed to sustain the reaction, or the amount of material to provide the density of its core.

So we are stuck here floating on this fractured topology waiting for a solution. We are like bored children in a warm bath, complacent and waiting for it to grow cold.

The meaning of anything is found and defined by its opposite, yet their relationship is found in the duality and is far more profound and complex.

A simple example would be that hot and cold create the relationship of temperature. Too hot burns, too cold freezes and cracks, lukewarm dulls and sickens. The variation creates the color.

The more complicated is the magnitude of vibrating waves defining everything that exists. The frequency determines just what is visible, auditory, tactile, palatable and odorous. We even have brainwaves loosely defining a sixth sense which can be modified by creating certain interference.

Density creates tactile sensations, in smaller form the vibrations create tastes by literally fitting into taste receptors like puzzle pieces. Smaller still are the odor causing particles. After that you stop measuring things in particles and start measuring waves of sound and light. Further still you measure vibrations in infrared and ultraviolet spectrums as radio waves and micro waves and other bands exist further out in the spectrum.

All things exist in this dual channel vibration. We never escape polarity at the highest or at the lowest level because the only thing you can measure in mathematics are extremes.

IF I WERE A BETTING MAN I'D PUT MY MONEY ON THE FOURTH DIMENSION BEING CURVED.

If you look at the fourth dimensional symmetry of a diamond it is densely compacted like a set of ball bearings in a tight grip. What you would end up with if you tightly packed the lighter ones into a rigid balloon would be a near perfect sphere due to the surface tension of the skin of the balloon.

The same thing happens with water molecules forming spherical drops in clouds or surface tension bringing them to a roundedness. The same thing goes for a planetoid in space being rounded off by the magnetic and gravitational forces surrounding it. Even at the smallest you see atoms and quarks behaving along this path.

So what we have is the measurement of polarity along a sphere. When folding space is one were to measure the opposite by some way to graph the data along a toroid donut we could then use that opposite data in a quantum computer to solve for Heisenberg's uncertainty. However far away the equations for a given piece of matter in superposition would be I believe we are at the point of discovering this through the realization of the electronic computing singularity.

When one realizes that the potential for using this toroid form as a massive portal exists then spacefolding along the toroid of the two points really just becomes about solving the energy needs of the toroid itself.

However would you be able to control wether you moved across space and time? How would you compensate for those forces? Would you need a generator on both sides or just a field effecting the object in motion? Would you need all three?

I imagine one toroid would have a negative charge or be the catcher.

The other one would be the positive naturally throwing.

The field would be neutral to protect the craft, or the passengers.

What would a hole in the fourth dimension look like?

Imagine a sphere that looked flat. As you pass around it on all sides it would look like what you would see on the other side of the hole in all directions. It would be kind of like passing around the edges of a highly polished metallic sphere but instead of seeing a mirror image of a convex sphere you would see the projected image of the reality on the other side of a concave sphere in all directions.

If you were to enter the center of the sphere the gravity would exist at the edges of the sphere so the edges would be where the attraction would lie. This is why we would have to create a sphere of antigravity around the edges of the craft. It would be like an extremely strong vacuum ready to vaporize you due to the immense pressure from the center driving your mass to the edges. Imagine feeling like a bubble about to pop.

So you would need to create a gate on either side and a force field to stabilize the traveler. You could theoretically travel to any place or time given the amount of distance. A hole in the fourth dimension travels across space and time simultaneously so you would in theory be traveling along two axes on a flat graph within the quantum computer of when and where.

Extra dimensional travel is not only possible but it would not be as readily defined by physical laws. At a certain point you would have travelers that were under different laws of nature due to different outcomes of the big bang.

I think it would be like tuning in two radio stations at once and playing the interference pattern on an oscilloscope. You would see just the right wave form between space and time to get what ever you wanted.

Maybe this was what the famous Manhattan project and Montauk machines really did. Maybe John Titor is real. Maybe all things really are possible and all of the creatures of your nightmares exist, somewhere beyond the void...